三教融合视域下李翱心性论探析
四川师范大学，成都，中国（Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China）
Abstract
中文
李翱是我国中唐时期著名的哲学家、文学家，核心思想是由其《复性书》而阐发的心性论。本文通梳理中唐三教互动的背景以及李翱与佛道思想的接触渊源，并对其《复性书》进行义理解读，进而比照佛道相关理论，揭示其心性论的内在理路与融合转化。李翱以儒学为本，吸收佛教如来藏与道教思想，构建了以“复性”为核心、贯通天人的儒学体系，呈现出“同归型”三教会通的典型特征。李翱心性论的研究为儒学发展提供了义理阐释的新路径，完善了中古三教思想互动与儒家心性之学。
English
Li Ao was a prominent philosopher and litterateur of the Mid-Tang period in China, whose core ideas revolve around the theory of mind-nature as elaborated in his work On Recovering Human Nature (Fu Xing Shu). This article traces the context of the interaction among Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism during the Mid-Tang era, examines Li Ao’s intellectual engagement with Buddhist and Daoist thought, and offers a philosophical interpretation of On Recovering Human Nature. By comparing relevant Buddhist and Daoist theories, it elucidates the internal logic and synthetic adaptation underlying Li Ao’s theory of mind and nature.Grounded in Confucianism, Li Ao assimilated elements from Buddhist Tathāgatagarbha thought and Daoist philosophy to construct a Confucian system centered on “recovering human nature,” one that connects heaven and humanity and exemplifies the “syncretic paradigm” of harmonizing the three teachings. Li Ao’s theory of mind and human nature pioneered a novel philosophical trajectory for the development of Confucianism and contributed significantly to the intellectual interplay among the three teachings in medieval China, as well as to the advancement of Confucian learning of mind and nature.
Keywords:
李翱; 三教融合; 心性论; 复性; 《复性书》; Li Ao; syncretism of the three teachings; theory of mind-nature; recovering human nature; On Recovering Human NatureCopyright Notice & License:
This work is published in Three Teachings Studies: Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism (TTS) and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under this license, users are free to share and adapt the material for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), the journal (TTS), and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PDF Downloads
Journal Info
How to Cite
References
书籍：
陈来。《宋明理学》。上海：华东师范大学出版社，2004。
陈弱水。《〈复性书〉思想渊源再探——汉唐心性观念史之一章》。台湾：《中央研究院历史语言研究所集刊》，1998。
方立天。《中国佛教哲学要义》。北京：中国人民大学出版社，2005。
冯友兰。《中国哲学史》（下）。北京：三联书店，2009。
傅斯年。《性命古训辨证》。桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2006。
唐君毅。《中国哲学原论·原性篇》。北京：中国社会科学出版社，2005。
徐复观。《中国人性论史·先秦篇》。上海：上海三联书店，2001。
周振甫译注。《周易译注》。北京：中华书局，1991。
古籍：
（梁）真谛译。《大乘起信论》。载于《大正藏》第32册。
（魏）王弼注，楼宇烈校释。《老子道德经注校释》。北京：中华书局，2008。
（唐）惠能述，法海集记。《南宗顿教最上大乘摩诃般若波罗蜜经六祖惠能大师于韶州大梵寺施法坛经》卷一。载于《大正藏》第48册。
（唐）李翱撰，郝润华、杜学林校注。《李翱文集校注》。北京：中华书局，2021。
（宋）朱熹。《晦庵集》。载于《晦庵先生朱文公文集》卷第35，《四部丛刊》景明嘉靖本。
（清）郭庆藩辑，王孝鱼点校。《庄子集释》。北京：中华书局，2006。
（清）王先谦撰，沈啸寰、王星贤点校。《荀子集解》。北京：中华书局，2012。
《老子说常清静经注》。载于《道藏》。文物出版社、上海书店、天津古籍出版社，1988。
期刊文章：
李四龙。《论儒释道“三教合流”的类型》。《北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》48卷2期（2011）。
