Defining the Optimal Timing for Cochlear Implant Activation: A Review of the Literature and Current Practice Variability
Medical College, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruth Km Pfau Civil Hospital
Sindh Institute of Child Health and Neonatology, Karachi, Pakistan
Abstract
Hearing loss is among the top three non-fatal disabling conditions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where cochlear implantation (CI), the gold standard for severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, remains underused. Conventionally, device activation occurs 2–4 weeks postoperatively; however, early activation (EA) within days of surgery has shown promising benefits. Literature reveals inconsistencies in defining EA and late activation (LA). Some studies report device activation as early as 1 to 7 days postoperatively, while others classify activation within 8 to 14 days as either EA or LA. Traditionally, activation has been reported between 9 and 46 days postoperatively. This lack of consensus complicates the development of standardized postoperative activation timelines and impedes evidence-based clinical guidelines.
This narrative review aims to compare the outcomes, feasibility, and safety of EA versus traditional activation in CI patients while highlighting the variability in definitions and activation timelines across studies. A thorough literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Google. Seventeen studies were included, comprising 3 systematic reviews, 2 literature reviews, and 12 primary studies.
Most studies reported EA on the first postoperative day, demonstrating benefits such as faster auditory rehabilitation, improved speech recognition, reduced anxiety, and higher patient satisfaction. EA was not associated with increased complications and was cost-effective, particularly for patients from remote areas. However, long-term impedance outcomes were similar between EA and LA.
In conclusion, first-day EA appears feasible, safe, and beneficial. Still, large-scale prospective studies are needed to establish optimal activation timing and support standardized CI care protocols.
Keywords:
Otology; Sensorineural Hearing Loss; Hearing Rehabilitation; Device Activation ; Cochlear ImplantationData Availability Statement
No new data was generated or analyzed in this study. All information was obtained from previously published literature due to the narrative nature of this review.
Copyright Notice & License:
All articles published in Health Nexus are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
By submitting to this journal, authors agree to the terms of this license. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PDF Downloads
Journal Info
How to Cite
References
Bodington E, Saeed SR, Smith MCF, Stocks NG, Morse RP. A narrative review of the logistic and economic feasibility of cochlear implants in lower-income countries. Cochlear Implants Int. 2021;22(1):7-16. doi:10.1080/14670100.2020.1793070
Crowson MG, Semenov YR, Tucci DL, Niparko JK. Quality of Life and Cost-Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants: A Narrative Review. Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(4-5):236-258. doi:10.1159/000481767
Bruschke S, Baumann U, Stöver T. Long-Term Follow-Up of Early Cochlear Implant Device Activation. Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(5):327-337. doi:10.1159/000512760
Batuk MO, Yarali M, Cinar BC, et al. Is Early Cochlear Implant Device Activation Safe for All on-the-Ear and off-the-Ear Sound Processors? Audiol Neurootol. 2019;24(6):279-284. doi:10.1159/000503378
Bruschke S, Baumann U, Stöver T. Residual low-frequency hearing after early device activation in cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;280(9):3977. doi:10.1007/s00405-023-07887-0
Saoji AA, Adkins WJ, Graham MK, Carlson ML. Does early activation within hours after cochlear implant surgery influence electrode impedances? Int J Audiol. 2022;61(6):520-525. doi:10.1080/14992027.2021.1942569
Parker R, Muzaffar J, AuD MA, Brassington W. Early activation of cochlear implants: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Cochlear Implants Int. 2024;25(1):81-92. doi:10.1080/14670100.2023.2290777
Alahmadi A, Abdelsamad Y, Alothman NI, et al. A Literature Review on Cochlear Implant Activation: From Weeks to Hours. Ear Nose Throat J. Published online August 8, 2023:1455613231188294. doi:10.1177/01455613231188294
Coelho DH, Shiao AS, Li LPH. Very early activation of cochlear implants: A review of the literature. J Chin Med Assoc JCMA. 2023;86(1):7-10. doi:10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000816
Early activation after cochlear implantation: a systematic review | European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. Accessed November 19, 2024. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00405-023-07965-3
Soncini A, Franzini S, Di Marco F, et al. Early fitting in cochlear implant surgery: preliminary results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024;281(1):61-66. doi:10.1007/s00405-023-08076-9
Cochlear implant device activation and programming: 5 days postimplantation - PubMed. Accessed November 19, 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24622029/
Hagr A, Garadat SN, Al-Momani M, Alsabellha RM, Almuhawas FA. Feasibility of one-day activation in cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(5):323-328. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.996824
Alhabib SF, Abdelsamad Y, Yousef M, Alzhrani F, Hagr A. Effect of early activation of cochlear implant on electrode impedance in pediatric population. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;140:110543. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110543
Alahmadi A, Abdelsamad Y, Yousef M, et al. Cochlear Implantation: Long-Term Effect of Early Activation on Electrode Impedance. J Clin Med. 2024;13(11):3299. doi:10.3390/jcm13113299
Sun CH, Chang CJ, Hsu CJ, Wu HP. Feasibility of early activation after cochlear implantation. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019;44(6):1004-1010. doi:10.1111/coa.13427
Roux-Vaillard S, Pineau A, Laccourreye L, Boucher S. Immediate activation after cochlear implantation: Preliminary Study. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2020;137(1):17-20. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2019.09.009
Chen JKC, Chuang AYC, Sprinzl GM, Tung TH, Li LPH. Safety and feasibility of initial frequency mapping within 24 hours after cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 2015;135(6):592-597. doi:10.3109/00016489.2015.1006335
Bresnihan M, Norman G, Scott F, Viani L. Measurement of Comfort Levels by Means of Electrical Stapedial Reflex in Children. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2001;127(8):963-966. doi:10.1001/archotol.127.8.963
Park B, Thak PK, Park E, et al. Dynamic Range and Neural Response Threshold in Cochlear Implant Mapping Can Be Useful in Predicting Prognosis Related to Postoperative Speech Perception. J Audiol Otol. 2023;27(4):212. doi:10.7874/jao.2023.00374
Sonoyama T, Ishino T, Oda T, et al. Effectiveness of Expanded Instantaneous Input Dynamic Range Adjustment on Speech Perception. J Pers Med. 2022;12(11):1860. doi:10.3390/jpm12111860
Early activation of a late sequential cochlear implant systematic review. J Otolaryngol-ENT Res. 2022;Volume 14(Issue 3). doi:10.15406/joentr.2022.14.00513
