Retraction Policy
Panorama Frontier Review
Panorama Frontier Review is committed to maintaining the integrity and reliability of the scholarly record. In cases where serious problems are identified in published articles, the journal may issue a retraction in order to correct the academic literature.
Grounds for Retraction
An article may be retracted if there is clear evidence of:
- plagiarism or substantial overlap with previously published work
- fabrication or falsification of research data
- major methodological errors that invalidate the conclusions
- unethical research practices
- duplicate or redundant publication
- serious violations of publication ethics
Retractions are intended to correct the scholarly record and inform readers about unreliable or problematic publications.
Retraction Procedure
When potential concerns are raised regarding a published article, the editorial office will conduct an investigation. This may involve consultation with the authors, reviewers, editors, and, when appropriate, the authors’ affiliated institutions.
If the concerns are confirmed and warrant retraction, the journal will issue a formal retraction notice.
Retraction Notice
A retraction notice will:
- clearly identify the retracted article
- explain the reason for the retraction
- remain permanently linked to the original article
The original article will remain accessible but will be clearly marked as “Retracted” to maintain the transparency of the scholarly record.
Author-Initiated Retractions
Authors may request a retraction if they discover significant errors in their published work that affect the reliability of the findings. The editorial office will evaluate such requests and determine the appropriate course of action.
Commitment to Transparency
Panorama Frontier Review aims to handle retractions in a transparent and responsible manner in order to maintain the credibility and trustworthiness of academic publishing.
