Complaints & Appeals
Panorama Frontier Review
Panorama Frontier Review is committed to maintaining a fair, transparent, and accountable editorial process. The journal provides procedures for authors, reviewers, and readers to raise complaints or appeal editorial decisions where appropriate.
Complaints
Complaints may relate to issues such as:
- concerns about the editorial process
- delays in the peer review process
- concerns regarding publication ethics
- disputes related to authorship or conflicts of interest
- concerns about published content
Individuals who wish to submit a complaint should contact the journal’s editorial office and provide clear details regarding the issue. The editorial office will review the complaint and, where appropriate, conduct an investigation.
The journal aims to respond to complaints in a timely and professional manner.
Appeals
Authors who believe that a manuscript decision was made in error may submit an appeal. Appeals should include a detailed explanation of the reasons for the request and may provide additional information or clarification regarding the manuscript.
Appeals will be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief or another appropriate editorial representative who was not directly involved in the original decision when possible.
The editorial team will evaluate the appeal based on the reviewers’ comments, editorial assessments, and the academic merits of the manuscript.
Final Decision
Following the evaluation of a complaint or appeal, the journal will communicate its decision to the relevant parties.
The decision reached after the review of the complaint or appeal will be considered final.
Commitment to Transparency
Panorama Frontier Review is committed to addressing complaints and appeals in a fair, objective, and transparent manner in order to maintain trust in the editorial and publication process.
