Reviewer Guidelines

CSGS relies on the expertise and integrity of our peer reviewers to maintain the highest standards of scientific rigor, methodological transparency, and global relevance.

1. Purpose of Peer Review

The primary role of a reviewer is to provide an objective evaluation and constructive feedback to support academic quality. We follow a double-blind review system.

2. Review Timeline

14–21 Days

Timely reviews are essential to meet our target of a First Decision within 30 days.

3. Evaluation Criteria

Originality

Does the work contribute new knowledge to climate sustainability or global systems?

Methodological Rigor

Are methods appropriate, assumptions transparent, and models reproducible?

Data Integrity

Are results verifiable? Is the Data Availability Statement accurate?

Relevance & Impact

Does the study demonstrate systemic understanding and global implications?

4. Ethical Responsibilities

  • Maintain strict confidentiality.
  • Declare all conflicts of interest.
  • Alert editors to plagiarism or fabrication.

5. AI and Technology Use

Confidential manuscripts must not be entered into AI systems. AI must not replace independent scholarly judgment.

7. Constructive Feedback & Recommendations

Reviews should be professional, respectful, and actionable. Possible recommendations:

Accept Minor Revision Major Revision Reject
8 & 9. Citation Ethics & Confidentiality

Do not request citations to your own work without justification. Delete all manuscript files after completing the review.

10. Recognition of Reviewers

We value your contribution. CSGS provides acknowledgment certificates and anonymized annual statistics.

Thank you for your commitment to scientific integrity and global sustainability research.