Research on China’s Strategies for Addressing Non-Tariff Barriers and Anti-dumping under the New Trade Protectionism Background
Abstract
The rise of neo-trade protectionism has reshaped the global trade order, shifting emphasis from traditional tariffs to non-tariff barriers (NTBs) and trade remedies justified on regulatory grounds. This study investigates China’s increasing reliance on NTBs—such as technical barriers to trade (TBT), sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures, and chemical regulatory frameworks—and its frequent use of anti-dumping actions to pursue industrial protection and structural adjustment. Based on WTO notifications, MOFCOM case announcements, and trade statistics, the paper analyzes three key cases: the 2015 Bisphenol-A (BPA) anti-dumping dispute, regulatory frictions between Korea’s K-REACH and China’s chemical control system, and China’s anti-dumping duties on Korean stainless steel plate.
Findings reveal that China’s measures serve dual purposes: short-term protection of domestic industries facing overcapacity and long-term promotion of supply chain localization and technological upgrading. For Korea, these actions led to marked export declines—BPA market share fell from 21% in 2014 to under 10% in 2017, and stainless steel exports dropped over 60% between 2015 and 2018. Policy implications suggest Korea must strengthen institutional negotiation, advance firm-level patent and standards strategies, and build multilateral alliances to offset China’s regulatory power. This study contributes to the literature by situating China’s NTBs and anti-dumping practices within the broader neo-protectionist paradigm and offering strategic insights for Korea’s policy response.
Keywords:
Neo-trade protectionism; Non-tariff barriers; Anti-dumping; Trade policy; China; KoreaCopyright Notice & License:
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under this license:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
-
Users are free to share (copy and redistribute) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, including commercial use.
-
Proper attribution must be given to:
-
The original author(s),
-
PoliEcoM Administration Review as the source,
-
The article’s DOI or permanent URL,
-
And the license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
-
There are no restrictions on commercial reuse, derivative works, or machine-readable access (e.g., AI training or meta-research).
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt. 1992. “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction.” Econometrica 60 (2): 323–351.
Aiginger, Karl, and Dani Rodrik. 2020. “Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 20: 189–207.
Amsden, Alice H. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, edited by Richard R. Nelson, 609–625. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Block, Fred, and Matthew R. Keller, eds. 2011. State of Innovation: The U.S. Government’s Role in Technology Development. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Bureau of Industry Injury Investigation, State Economic and Trade Commission. 2003. “The Effects, Problems, and Policy Recommendations of China’s Anti-dumping Work.” China Economic and Trade Herald 2003 (5).
Chang, Ha-Joon. 1994. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem Press.
Chang, Ha-Joon, and Antonio Andreoni. 2020. “Industrial Policy in the 21st Century.” Development and Change 51 (2): 324–351.
Chen, Jian. 2003. “Countermeasures for Improving China’s Anti-dumping Legislation under WTO Rules.” Law and Social Development 2003 (3).
Cimoli, Mario, Giovanni Dosi, and Joseph E. Stiglitz, eds. 2009. Industrial Policy and Development: The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
David, Paul A., and Dominique Foray. 1995. “Assessing and Expanding the Science and Technology Knowledge Base.” Science and Public Policy 22 (4): 205–215.
Evans, Peter B. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Evans, Peter B., Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Greenwald, Bruce, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. 2006. “Helping Infant Economies Grow: Foundations of Trade Policies for Developing Countries.” American Economic Review 96 (2): 141–146.
Harrison, Ann, and Andrés Rodríguez-Clare. 2010. “Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries.” In Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 5, edited by Dani Rodrik and Mark R. Rosenzweig, 4039–4214. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Krueger, Anne O. 1990. “Government Failures in Development.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 (3): 9–23.
Krugman, Paul. 1987. “Is Free Trade Passé?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1 (2): 131–144.
Lin, Justin Yifu. 2012. New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Lin, Justin Yifu, and Célestin Monga. 2010. “Growth Identification and Facilitation: The Role of the State in the Dynamics of Structural Change.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5313. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Lin, Justin Yifu, and Ha-Joon Chang. 2009. “Should Industrial Policy in Developing Countries Conform to Comparative Advantage or Defy It? A Debate between Justin Lin and Ha-Joon Chang.” Development Policy Review 27 (5): 483–502.
Lyu, Tingjin. 2003. “WTO Rules and China’s Anti-dumping Legislation.” Law Science 2003 (3).
Mazzucato, Mariana. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.
Mazzucato, Mariana. 2018. The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. London: Allen Lane.
Pack, Howard, and Kamal Saggi. 2006. “Is There a Case for Industrial Policy? A Critical Survey.” The World Bank Research Observer 21 (2): 267–297.
Piore, Michael J., and Charles F. Sabel. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
Rodrik, Dani. 2004. “Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century.” Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
Rodrik, Dani. 2007. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rodrik, Dani. 2008. “Normalizing Industrial Policy.” Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper No. 3. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Bruce C. Greenwald. 2014. Creating a Learning Society: A New Approach to Growth, Development, and Social Progress. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Warwick, Ken. 2013. “Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 2. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Weiss, Linda. 1998. The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Xie, Hui. 2004. “On the Relationship between Anti-dumping and Safeguard Measures.” Politics and Law 2004 (5).

