Pragmatism Versus Formalism: Theoretical Analysis and Reform Reflections on the Dilemmas of Modern Governance
School of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
Abstract
This paper explores the persistent tension between formalism and pragmatism in modern governance, analyzing their theoretical underpinnings, real-world manifestations, and policy implications. Formalism, rooted in bureaucratic rationality and institutional legitimacy, often leads to governance inefficiencies through over-compliance, risk avoidance, and symbolic conformity. Drawing on case studies from China’s local governance and Western regulatory systems, the paper illustrates how formalism manifests in performance fabrication, digitalized formalism, and compliance overload. In contrast, pragmatism offers a problem-oriented, outcome-driven approach that emphasizes adaptability and stakeholder collaboration. Through examples from Singapore and Denmark, the study highlights pragmatic strategies that can enhance governance responsiveness. However, it also acknowledges the institutional risks of pragmatism, such as blurred accountability and short-termism. The paper concludes by proposing an integrated governance model that balances formal rules with practical effectiveness, supported by adaptive institutions, robust feedback mechanisms, and a culture of responsible experimentation.
Keywords:
Formalism; Pragmatism; Governance Effectiveness; Institutional Legitimacy; Accountability; Policy Implementation; Performance Management; Compliance OverloadCopyright Notice & License:
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under this license:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
-
Users are free to share (copy and redistribute) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, including commercial use.
-
Proper attribution must be given to:
-
The original author(s),
-
PoliEcoM Administration Review as the source,
-
The article’s DOI or permanent URL,
-
And the license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
-
There are no restrictions on commercial reuse, derivative works, or machine-readable access (e.g., AI training or meta-research).
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PDF Downloads
Journal Info
How to Cite
References
Secretariat of the Theoretical Study Group of the Party Committee of the School. 2024. “Special Study on the ‘Regulations on Rectifying Formalism to Reduce the Burden on the Grassroots.’” Journal of Theory, October 8. https://ztjy.nbt.edu.cn/__local/1/E0/F1/1CDEC0E8F12E118CA282601E688_0D9A7689_E0A1D.pdf.
Ji, Qing. 2017. “A Brief Analysis of Six Common Forms of Formalism and Bureaucratism.” China Discipline Inspection and Supervision Journal, no. 10: 21–23.
Li, Juan. 2025. “Central Commission for Discipline Inspection Website: Some Localities Still Have Issues with Formalism and Bureaucratism Increasing the Burden on the Grassroots.” Beijing Daily, December 2. https://xinwen.bjd.com.cn/content/s67abe893e4b068c68f0fb005.html.
Xinhua News. 2025. “Typical Cases Publicly Reported at the Central Level in 2023 and 2024 on Rectifying Formalism to Reduce the Burden on the Grassroots.” Minqing County People's Government, Winter 2. https://www.fzmq.gov.cn/xjwz/zwgk/gggs/202502/t20250220_4978598.htm
Li, Junjie, and Bangfan Liu. 2024. “Research on the Generative Logic and Configuration Effects of the Policy Implementation Environment in China’s Grassroots Digital Construction: Traceability Based on Grounded Theory and the Validation of the CsQCA Method.” PLoS One, no. 19 (2024): 4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301667.
Financial Services Regulation Committee. 2025. “Culture of Risk Aversion among Financial Regulators Undermines Their Competitiveness and Growth Objective, Warns Committee Report.” Parliamentary Committees and Public Enquiries, June 13. https://www.wired-gov.net/wg/news.nsf/articles/Culture+of+risk+aversion+among+financial+regulators+undermines+their+competitiveness+and+growth+objective+warns+Committee+report+13062025112500?open.
Sweet, Pat. 2025. “Regulation: Reversing the ‘Risk Aversion Ratchet.’” Asset Finance Connect, January 8. https://assetfinanceconnect.com/regulation-reversing-the-risk-aversion-ratchet/.
The Art of Service. n.d. “Government Agency Improves Compliance.” https://irm.theartofservice.com/case-study-government/.
Department of Health & Social Care. 2020. “Reducing Bureaucracy in the Health and Social Care System: Background and Questions.” November 24. https://www.gov.uk/government/calls-for-evidence/reducing-bureaucracy-in-the-health-and-social-care-system-call-for-evidence/reducing-bureaucracy-in-the-health-and-social-care-system-background-and-questions.
NHS Confederation. 2013. Challenging Bureaucracy. BOK60069 ed. 50 Broadway, London: The NHS Confederation. https://www.nhsconfed.org/system/files/media/challenging-bureaucracy%20%281%29_0.pdf.
Thayer, H. S., and Sandra B. Rosenthal. 2025. “Pragmatism.” Britannica, July 11. https://www.britannica.com/topic/pragmatism-philosophy.
Garrison, Jim. 2000. “Pragmatism and Public Administration.” Administration & Society 32 (4): 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019524.
Koh, Serene, and Rachel Lim. 2024. “What Can We Learn about Governance and Public Service Leadership from Singapore?” Behavioural Insights Team, December 11. https://www.bi.team/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/What-can-we-learn-about-governance-and-public-service-leadership-from-Singapore_.pdf.
Miller, Lindsay M. 2019. “Pragmatism and Public Administration.” National Civic League 108: 71.
Kaushik, Vibha, and Christine A. Walsh. 2019. “Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research.” Social Sciences 8 (9): 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255.
Bradley, Neil. 2025. “How Excessive Regulation Hurts the Economy.” U.S. Chamber of Commerce, January 16. https://www.uschamber.com/economy/how-excessive-regulation-hurts-the-economy.
Eggers, William D., Matthew Gracie, Brandon Touchie, NSN Murty, and Glynis Rodrigues. 2025. “Delivering on Reducing Government Red Tape.” Government & Public Services, June 4. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/government-public-sector-services/government-trends/2025/reducing-government-red-tape.html.
Lee, Sarah. 2025. “Your Top Gov Bureaucracy Red Tape & Econ.” Number Analytics, April 25. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/top-gov-bureaucracy-red-tape-econ.
Rockman, Bert. 2025. “Bureaucracy.” Britannica, August 15. https://www.britannica.com/topic/bureaucracy.
Adidur, Dr. n.d. Online Class Notes for 6 SEM (G) & 4 (M). https://haaconline.org.in/attendence/classnotes/files/1588499661.pdf.
Zhou, Xueguang. 2017. The Institutional Logic of State Governance in China: An Organizational Study. 1st ed. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company. ISBN 9787108058331.
Li, Zhiyong. 2020. “Digging into the Roots and Eliminating the Soil that Breeds Formalism.” People’s Forum, March 31. http://paper.people.com.cn/rmlt/html/2020-03/31/content_1982280.htm.
Shaoyang Economic Development Zone. 2020. “Rectifying Formalism and Bureaucratism Is Both a Tough Battle and a Protracted War.” Party Conduct and Integrity, September 21. https://jkq.shaoyang.gov.cn/jkq/dflz2/202009/7942c046104d4dfe8cf1ddb44590aa62.shtml.
Li, Zhuoran. 2025. “The Real Roots of Formalism in Chinese Bureaucracy.” The Diplomat, January 10. https://thediplomat.com/2025/01/the-real-roots-of-formalism-in-chinese-bureaucracy/.
Atkin, Albert. n.d. “Charles Sanders Peirce: Pragmatism.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/peircepr/.
Atkin, Albert. n.d. “Charles Sanders Peirce (1839—1914).” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/peirce-charles-sanders/.
Yang, Shoukan. 2011. “A Dialectical Analysis of ‘Pragmatism.’” National Philosophy and Social Science Work Office, May 5. http://www.nopss.gov.cn/GB/219567/219574/14587199.html.
Yang, Shoukan. 2024. “On Peirce’s Pragmatic Philosophy: The Establishment of Belief and the Methods and Significance of Gaining Scientific Belief.” Advances in Philosophy 13 (8): 1692–1698. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2024.138253.
Foust, Mathew A. 2007. “William James and the Promise of Pragmatism.” William James Studies 2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26203702.
Castaldy, Daniel. 2023. “Pragmatism by William James.” EBSCO Research Starters: Religion and Philosophy. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/pragmatism-william-james.
Field, Richard. n.d. “John Dewey (1859—1952).” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/john-dewey/.
Weinel, Ivan. 2023. “Dewey Applies Pragmatism to Education.” EBSCO Research Starters: Religion and Philosophy. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/dewey-applies-pragmatism-education.
Wikipedia. 2025. “Patricia M. Shields.” Last modified June 10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_M._Shields.
Shields, Patricia M., Maurice Hamington, and Joseph Soeters, eds. 2023. The Oxford Handbook of Jane Addams. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780197544518. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-jane-addams-9780197544518.
Posner, Richard A. 1986. “Legal Formalism, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of Statutes and the Constitution.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 37 (2): 3.
Lyons, David. 1981. “Legal Formalism and Instrumentalism: A Pathological Study.” Cornell Law Review 66 (5): 2.
Wikipedia. 2025. “Political Legitimacy.” Last modified August 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_legitimacy.
Liaoning Daily. 2025. “Improving the Long-Term Mechanism for Eliminating ‘Formalism at Your Fingertips.’” Liaoning Discipline Inspection and Supervision Net, June 3. https://www.lnsjjjc.gov.cn/network/llcs/2025/06/03/784341043590993182.shtml.
Jiang, Hong. 2025. “Governance of Government-Intervened R&D Consortia: A Bi-Decoupling Based Analysis Framework.” China Soft Science, no. 1: 77–85. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7200172518&from=Qikan_Search_Index.
He, Ying. 2014. “A Methodological Critique of the New Public Management Theory.” Communist Party of China News Net, November 5. http://theory.people.com.cn/n/2014/1105/c83863-25980551.html.
Li, Yuyun. 2016. “The Scholarly Evolution of Early Public Administration Research (1887–1926).” Journal of Fujian Institute of Administration, no. 2: 29–39.
World Bank, and Asia Competitiveness Institute, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore. 2017. “Seminar II: Competitiveness, Trade, Livability, and Productivity in the Greater China Economic Circle and India.” Asia Economic Forum 2017: The Impact and Significance of the Belt and Road Initiative, August 29. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/aci/2017-asia-economic-forum-seminar-2-proceedings-(chinese).pdf?sfvrsn=540c7e0a_2.
China Organization and Personnel News. 2016. “How Singapore Evaluates Civil Servants’ Performance.” Communist Party Member Net, May 22. https://news.12371.cn/2016/05/22/ARTI1463866949144133.shtml.
BlockScience®. 2024. “Engineering for Legitimacy.” BlockScience Blog, March 19. https://blog.block.science/engineering-for-legitimacy/.
International Republican Institute. 2021. “Conflict, Governance and Legitimacy Assessment Framework.” December. https://www.iri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/iri-conflict-governance-framework-120221.pdf.
Fiveable. 2024. “Performance Legitimacy – Intro to Political Science.” Accessed August 18, 2025. https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/intro-to-poli-sci/performance-legitimacy.
Lee, Sarah. 2025. “Legitimacy in Public Policy.” Number Analytics, May 24. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-to-policy-legitimacy.
Brettschneider, Corey. 2005. “Balancing Procedures and Outcomes within Democratic Theory: Core Values and Judicial Review.” Political Studies 53 (2): 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00536.x.
de Graaf, Gjalt, and Hester Paanakker. 2014. “Good Governance: Performance Values and Procedural Values in Conflict.” Political Studies 45 (6): 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014529361.
Meng, Lichao, Shuang Lai, and Ningjuan Li. 2019. “A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Public Policy Processes: A Case Study of the New Household Registration Policy in Xi’an.” Advances in Social Sciences 8 (4): 675–688. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2019.84096.
Yin, Shuo. 2024. “Rectifying ‘Formalism at Your Fingertips’ (Ideological Horizons).” Communist Party of China News Net, September 3. http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2024/0903/c40531-40311648.html.
Xinhua News. 2024. “Meeting of the Central-Level Special Mechanism on Rectifying Formalism to Reduce Grassroots Burden Held in Beijing, Presided Over by Cai Qi.” Xinhua Net, January 1. http://www.news.cn/politics/leaders/20240129/45557fd5e3c94c6eb4d0bd0c62e11470/c.html.
Williams, Richard A., and Mark Adams. 2012. “Regulatory Overload.” Mercatus Center, February 8. https://www.mercatus.org/research/policy-briefs/regulatory-overload.
Mitratech Staff. 2024. “Supplier Risk Management: The Definitive Guide.” Mitratech, August 1. https://mitratech.com/resource-hub/blog/supplier-risk-management/.
Ibitola, Joseph. 2025. “Managing AML Risks for Ultra-High-Net-Worth Individuals: Global Compliance Best Practices.” Flagright, April 28. https://www.flagright.com/post/managing-aml-risks-for-ultra-high-net-worth-individuals.
Xinhua News Agency. 2019. “The General Office of the CPC Central Committee Issues the ‘Notice on Solving Prominent Problems of Formalism and Reducing the Burden on the Grassroots.’” Central People’s Government of the PRC, March 11. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202203/content_3635380.htm.
People’s Forum Net. 2025. “The CCDI Reports Typical Cases to Sound the Alarm for Grassroots Cadres!” Shangguan News, April 29. https://www.jfdaily.com/wx/detail.do?id=902014.
Ong, Bryan, and Gary Chew. 2024. “Pairing with AI for Public Sector Impact in Singapore.” Singapore Global Centre, September 26. https://www.undp.org/policy-centre/singapore/blog/pairing-ai-public-sector-impact-singapore.
Carstensen, Martin B., and Eva Sørensen. 2025. “Using Bricolage and Robustness Theory to Explain the Dynamism of Collaborative Governance.” Policy & Politics Journal Blog, June 18. https://policyandpoliticsblog.com/2025/06/18/using-bricolage-and-robustness-theory-to-explain-the-dynamism-of-collaborative-governance/.
Gillespie, Alex, Vlad Glăveanu, and Constance de Saint Laurent. 2024. Pragmatism and Methodology: Doing Research That Matters with Mixed Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031066.
Zhou, Wenzhang, and Song Ge. 2020. “The Position and Role of Execution in Institutional Construction.” People’s Forum, no. 26.
Budget Department, Ministry of Finance. 2022. “MOF Official Answers Questions on Further Advancing the Reform of Sub-Provincial Fiscal Systems.” Fiscal News, June 14. http://m.mof.gov.cn/czxw/202206/t20220614_3817681.htm.
Coglianese, Cary. 2024. “Compliance Is the Bridge to Better Regulatory Outcomes.” The Regulatory Review, February 12. https://www.theregreview.org/2024/02/12/coglianese-compliance-is-the-bridge-to-better-regulatory-outcomes/.
Zhao, Kezhi. n.d. “Zhao Kezhi in People’s Daily: Faithfully Fulfilling the New Era Mission Entrusted by the Party and the People.” National Immigration Administration. https://www.nia.gov.cn/n794014/n794021/c1292858/content.html
Kaufman, Herbert. 2015. Red Tape: Its Origins, Uses, and Abuses. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hood, Christopher. 2007. “Public Service Management by Numbers: Why Does It Vary? Where Has It Come From? What Are the Gaps and the Puzzles?” Public Money and Management 27 (2): 95–102.
Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.
Shields, Patricia M., and Hassan Tajalli. 2006. “Intermediate Theory: The Missing Link in Successful Student Scholarship.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 12 (3): 313–334.
Stivers, Camilla. 2008. Governance in Dark Times: Practical Philosophy for Public Service. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
de Graaf, Gjalt, and Hester Paanakker. 2015. “Good Governance: Performance Values and Procedural Values in Conflict.” The American Review of Public Administration 45 (6): 635–652.
