Tax Salience and Household Consumption in China: A Re-examination Based on the Nature of Taxation
Abstract
The concept of tax salience—the extent to which a tax's visibility influences consumer behavior—has attracted increasing attention in behavioral economics. This study re-examines tax salience within the institutional context of China’s distinctive tax structure. Using panel data from 31 provinces spanning 2015 to 2020 and applying a fixed-effects model, we assess the impact of value-added tax (VAT), consumption tax, and individual income tax on per capita household consumption expenditure. The empirical results reveal a nuanced pattern: VAT and consumption tax are significantly and positively associated with consumption, whereas individual income tax exerts a significant negative effect. Notably, the influence of tax salience is found to be secondary to the intrinsic economic attributes of the taxes themselves. Taxes embedded in prices—such as VAT and excise taxes—tend to elevate expenditures, especially on inelastic necessities, due to price increases. In contrast, taxes that directly reduce disposable income—such as individual income tax—curtail consumption capacity. The study argues that for most consumers, decision-making is guided primarily by final prices and available income, with the specific tax component often overlooked. These findings challenge the prevailing emphasis on tax salience as an independent determinant and contribute to a more nuanced understanding of tax policy design, particularly in the context of developing economies such as China.
Keywords:
tax salience; household consumption; tax policy; panel data analysis; indirect taxation; price elasticityCopyright Notice & License:
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under this license:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication.
-
Users are free to share (copy and redistribute) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, including commercial use.
-
Proper attribution must be given to:
-
The original author(s),
-
PoliEcoM Administration Review as the source,
-
The article’s DOI or permanent URL,
-
And the license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
-
There are no restrictions on commercial reuse, derivative works, or machine-readable access (e.g., AI training or meta-research).
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PDF Downloads
Journal Info
How to Cite
References
Adiego, M., N. Badenes, J. N. Buenaventura, M. J. Burgos, C. García-Herrera, and J. Rodriguez. 2015. “Evaluación de La Reforma Del IRPF de 2015 [Evaluation of the 2015 Personal Income Tax Reform].” Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
Agarwal, Sumit, and Wenlan Qian. 2013. “Consumption and Debt Response to Fiscal Stimuli: Evidence from a Large Panel of Consumers in Singapore.” Working paper. National University of Singapore.
Alm, James, and Asmaa El-Ganainy. 2013. “Value-Added Taxation and Consumption.” International Tax and Public Finance 20 (1): 105–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-012-9215-2.
Baye, Michael R., and Dan A. Black. 2012. Consumer Behavior, Cost of Living Measures, and the Income Tax. Vol. 276. Springer Science & Business Media.
Chang, Xin. 2020. “Does Tax Salience Change Consumer Choice? Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Collected Essays on Finance and Economics 256 (2): 21.
Chetty, Raj, Adam Looney, and Kory Kroft. 2009. “Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence.” American Economic Review 99 (4): 1145–77. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1145.
Einav, Liran, Dan Knoepfle, Jonathan Levin, and Neel Sundaresan. 2014. “Consumer Behavior in Online Shopping Is Affected by Sales Tax.” LSE American Politics and Policy (blog). December 2, 2014.
Falbe, Jennifer, Hannah R. Thompson, Caroline M. Becker, Natalia Rojas, Charles E. McCulloch, and Kristine A. Madsen. 2016. “Impact of the Berkeley Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption.” American Journal of Public Health 106 (10): 1865–71. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303362.
Finkelstein, Amy. 2009. “E–ZTax: Tax Salience and Tax Rates.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (3): 969–1010. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.969.
Gelardi, Alexander M. G. 2013. “Value-Added Tax and Consumer Spending: A Graphical Description Analysis.” Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v5i1.2936.
Goldin, Jacob. 2012. “Sales Tax Not Included: Designing Commodity Taxes for Inattentive Consumers.” Yale Law Journal 122: 258–99.
Goldin, Jacob. 2015. “Optimal Tax Salience.” Journal of Public Economics 131: 115–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.09.005.
Goldin, Jacob, and Tatiana Homonoff. 2013. “Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: Cigarette Tax Salience and Regressivity.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5 (1): 302–36. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.5.1.302.
Hayashi, Andrew T., Brina N. K. Nakamura, and David Gamage. 2013. “Experimental Evidence of Tax Salience and the Labor-Leisure Decision: Anchoring, Tax Aversion, or Complexity?” Public Finance Review 41 (2): 203–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142112446556.
Ishida, Shingo, and Yoshiro Nakazono. 2022. “Tax Salience and Attention Variation: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 26. Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4090188.
Levine-Schayowitz, H. 2017. “Taxation and Consumer Behavior.” In Handbook of Public Sector Economics, 523–60. Routledge.
Liu, Pin. 2022. “我国消费税承接共同富裕的因由与路径——推进消费税改革的新契机 [The Reasons and Paths for China’s Consumption Tax to Achieve Common Prosperity: A New Opportunity to Promote Consumption Tax Reform].” Difang Caizheng Yanjiu [Local Finance Research] 10: 76–82.
Macek, Roman. 2014. “The Impact of Taxation on Economic Growth: Case Study of OECD Countries.” Review of Economic Perspectives 14 (4): 309–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0002.
Marvão Pereira, António, and Oriol Roca-Sagalés. 2011. “Long-Term Effects of Fiscal Policies in Portugal.” Journal of Economic Studies 38 (1): 114–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443581111096167.
Olivola, Christopher Y., and Abigail B. Sussman. 2015. “Taxes and Consumer Behavior.” In Handbook of Behavioral Economics, 523–60. Routledge.
Perkins, Rachel H. 2014. “Salience and Sin: Designing Taxes in the New Sin Era.” BYU Law Review, 143–92.
Ruffle, Bradley J., and Nir E. Feldman. 2013. “The Impact of Tax Exclusive and Inclusive Prices on Demand.” Working Paper No. 1302. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
Varela, Paula. 2016. “What Is Tax Salience?” PhD diss., The Australian National University, Canberra.
Yang, Xiaoqian. 2022. “增值税税率比较：国际立法与中国选择 [VAT Rate Comparison: International Legislation and China’s Choice].” Zhengfa Luncong [Tribune of Political Science and Law] 3: 76–86.
Yıldız, Fatih, and Ufuk Sandalcı. 2016. “Vergilerin Özel Tüketim Harcamaları Üzerindeki Etkisine Yönelik Bir Uygulama: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği [An Application on the Effect of Taxes on Private Consumption Expenditures: The Case of OECD Countries].” Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches 5 (7).
