Publication Ethics

Comparative Philosophy and Religious Traditions (CPRT) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and academic integrity. The journal adheres to internationally recognized guidelines for scholarly publishing and follows the principles of transparency, accountability, and fairness in all aspects of its editorial and review processes.

CPRT supports the core practices recommended by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and upholds ethical standards for authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher.

1. Editorial Responsibility and Independence

The editorial team is responsible for ensuring the academic quality and integrity of all published content. Editorial decisions are based solely on scholarly merit, originality, clarity, and relevance to the journal’s scope.

The Editor-in-Chief and editorial board operate independently of the publisher in matters of editorial decision-making. No commercial, institutional, or political considerations influence publication decisions.

2. Peer Review Integrity

All submissions undergo a double-blind peer review process.

Reviewers are selected based on subject expertise and are required to evaluate manuscripts objectively, confidentially, and without conflicts of interest.

Editors ensure that:

• At least two independent reviewers evaluate each research article.
• Review processes are conducted fairly and transparently.
• Confidentiality is strictly maintained.

3. Authorship and Contributorship

Authors must meet recognized criteria for authorship, including substantial contribution to:

• Conceptualization or design
• Data analysis or interpretation
• Drafting or revising the manuscript

All authors must approve the final version prior to submission.

4. Originality and Plagiarism

Submitted manuscripts must be original and must not be under consideration elsewhere.

CPRT uses plagiarism detection tools to screen submissions.

Plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, duplication, or unattributed borrowing, will result in rejection or retraction as appropriate.

5. Research Integrity

Authors must ensure that:

• Data are accurately represented
• Sources are properly cited
• Arguments are not fabricated or falsified
• Ethical approval is obtained where required

For research involving human subjects, informed consent and institutional ethical approval must be documented where applicable.

6. Conflict of Interest

All authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the research or editorial decision-making process.

Conflicts may include:

• Financial relationships
• Institutional affiliations
• Personal or professional relationships

Undisclosed conflicts discovered after publication may result in corrective actions.

8. Corrections and Retractions

If significant errors or ethical concerns are identified after publication, the journal will take appropriate corrective measures, including:

• Publication of corrections
• Expressions of concern
• Retractions

Retractions are issued in cases of serious misconduct, including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or unethical research practices.

9. Complaints and Appeals

Authors who wish to appeal editorial decisions may submit a written appeal to the editorial office. Appeals are reviewed independently.

Complaints regarding ethical concerns or editorial conduct will be investigated fairly and confidentially.

10. Publisher Responsibilities

The publisher supports editorial independence and ensures that business considerations do not compromise academic standards.

The publisher maintains transparency regarding ownership, management, and funding structures.