Recognising Love Across Cultures: A Cross-Cultural Extension of the Love Confirmation Mechanism Model
Abstract
Love is a central concern in psychology, sociology, and cultural studies, yet existing scholarship has concentrated far more on what love consists of than on the epistemic problem of how actors know, judge, and validate that love is present. Structural theories have clarified the components of love, experiential theories have examined attachment and affect, and cultural approaches have analysed romantic discourse and symbolic expression. Much less attention has been given to the interpretive process through which individuals decide that a feeling, relationship, or social bond should count as love. Building on song2025's Love Confirmation Mechanism (LCM), this article advances the Love Confirmation Mechanism Model (LCMM) as a cross-cultural theoretical extension. The core argument is that love is not simply an internal emotional state but a socially interpretable phenomenon confirmed through multiple forms of evidence. The model identifies four domains of confirmatory signals: affective, relational, symbolic, and institutional. These signals do not possess fixed meaning. Rather, they are interpreted through culturally organised frameworks that shape how actors weigh emotional intensity, behavioural consistency, romantic symbolism, and social legitimacy. By shifting analytic attention from the ontology of love to the epistemology of love recognition, the LCMM makes three contributions. First, it theorises love recognition as a distinct process linking private feeling, interpersonal interpretation, and social validation. Second, it extends the LCM by specifying a multi-signal architecture of confirmation and by distinguishing intrapersonal, interpersonal, and social levels of recognition. Third, it provides a comparative framework for explaining why the same relational act may confirm love in one cultural setting but not in another, while also clarifying how love may be under-recognised, over-recognised, or contested when signals are incongruent or differently weighted. The article concludes by outlining implications for cross-cultural intimacy research, communication studies, and future empirical work on romantic legitimacy.
Keywords:
love recognition; Love Confirmation Mechanism Model; cross-cultural intimacy; relational signals; symbolic signals; institutional signalsData Availability Statement
This study is a theoretical work based on existing literature and conceptual analysis. No new empirical data were generated or analyzed in this study. All information is derived from publicly available sources cited in the references.
Copyright Notice & License:
This article is published in the Journal of Social Cognition and Communication under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adair, L., & Ferenczi, N. (2023). Cultural variation in relationship maintenance. In J. K. Mogilski & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology and romantic relationships (pp. 528-560). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197524718.013.20
Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
Averill, J. R. (1985). The social construction of emotion: With special reference to love. In K. Gergen & K. Davis (Eds.), The social construction of the person (pp. 89-109). Springer-Verlag.
Barthes, R. (1978). A lover's discourse: Fragments. Hill and Wang.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Polity Press.
Bouchard, G., Gaudet, M., Cloutier, G., & Martin, M. (2023). Attachment, relational maintenance behaviors and relationship quality in romantic long-distance relationships: A dyadic perspective. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 17(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.9771
Cancian, F. M. (1987). Love in America: Gender and self-development. Cambridge University Press.
Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Unwin Hyman.
Chen, Y., Liu, S., Hao, Y., Zhao, Q., Ren, J., Piao, Y., Wang, L., Yang, Y., Jin, C., Wang, H., Zhou, X., Gao, J.-H., Zhang, X., & Wei, Z. (2024). Higher emotional synchronization is modulated by relationship quality in romantic relationships and not in close friendships. NeuroImage, 297, 120733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120733
Chiasson, R. M., Goodboy, A. K., & Dillow, M. R. (2024). The indirect effect of relational turbulence on received emotional support through dyadic synchrony. Communication Research Reports, 41(3), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2024.2373192
Clark, A. N., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2025). Sexual and affectionate behaviors and satisfaction for adults in romantic relationships: A latent profile analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 54(1), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-03016-y
Cohen, M., Abargil, M., Ahissar, M., & Atzil, S. (2024). Social and nonsocial synchrony are interrelated and romantically attractive. Communications Psychology, 2, 57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00109-1
Cross, S. E., & Joo, M. (2023). Sociocultural perspectives on romantic relationships: A view from the East and West. In B. G. Ogolsky (Ed.), The sociocultural context of romantic relationships (pp. 29-54). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009158657.003
Dainton, M., & Stafford, L. (1993). Routine maintenance behaviors: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity and maintenance strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000206
Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01168.x
Doherty, J. K., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2024). Romantic love. In L. Al-Shawaf & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolution and the emotions (pp. 219-234). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197544754.013.10
Fehr, B. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(4), 557-579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.557
Fehr, B., & Russell, J. A. (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.425
Ge, F., Park, J., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (2022). How you talk about it matters: Cultural variation in communication directness in romantic relationships. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(6), 583-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221088934
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford University Press.
Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self-construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 510-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00377.x
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Press/Doubleday.
Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9(4), 383-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(86)80043-4
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392-402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.392
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551-575. https://doi.org/10.1086/227049
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
Holmes, M. (2010). The emotionalization of reflexivity. Sociology, 44(1), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509351626
Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT Press.
Illouz, E. (1997). Consuming the romantic utopia: Love and the cultural contradictions of capitalism. University of California Press.
Illouz, E. (2012). Why love hurts: A sociological explanation. Polity.
Jamieson, L. (1998). Intimacy: Personal relationships in modern societies. Polity Press.
Jankowiak, W., & Fischer, E. (1992). A cross-cultural perspective on romantic love. Ethnology, 31(2), 149-155. https://doi.org/10.2307/3773618
Karandashev, V. (2017). Romantic love in cultural contexts. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42683-9
Kawas, G., & Ogolsky, B. G. (2023). The sociocultural context of romantic relationships. In B. G. Ogolsky (Ed.), The sociocultural context of romantic relationships (pp. 1-6). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009158657.001
Levine, R., Sato, S., Hashimoto, T., & Verma, J. (1995). Love and marriage in eleven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(5), 554-571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022195265006
Luhmann, N. (1986). Love as passion: The codification of intimacy. Harvard University Press.
McEwan, B., & LeFebvre, L. E. (2023). Romantic relationships and social media. In B. G. Ogolsky (Ed.), The sociocultural context of romantic relationships (pp. 201-225). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009158657.011
Ogolsky, B. G., & Stafford, L. (2023). A systematic review of relationship maintenance: Reflecting back and looking to the future. Personal Relationships, 30(1), 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12429
Ricoeur, P. (2005). The course of recognition. Harvard University Press.
Rokach, A. (2024). Love culturally: How does culture affect intimacy, commitment & love. The Journal of Psychology, 158(1), 84-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2023.2244129
Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(2), 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029841
Shumway, D. R. (2003). Modern love: Romance, intimacy, and the marriage crisis. New York University Press.
Song, C. (2025). How is love recognised? A theoretical model of love confirmation mechanisms in romantic relationships. Journal of Law, Psychology, and Communication Studies, 1(1), 199-223. https://doi.org/10.63802/jlpcs.v1.i1.56
Sorokowski, P., Sorokowska, A., Karwowski, M., Groyecka, A., Aavik, T., Akello, G., Alm, C., Amjad, N., Anjum, A., Asao, K., Atama, C. S., Atamturk-Duyar, D., Ayebare, R., Batres, C., Bendixen, M., Bensafia, A., Bizumic, B., Bousena, M., Buss, D. M., ... Sternberg, R. J. (2021). Universality of the triangular theory of love: Adaptation and psychometric properties of the triangular love scale in 25 countries. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(1), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1787318
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273-286. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521
Swidler, A. (2001). Talk of love: How culture matters. University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 25-73). Princeton University Press.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1999). Communicating across cultures. Guilford Press.
Zelizer, V. A. (2005). The purchase of intimacy. Princeton University Press.
