A Componential Analysis of “Fuck”
Abstract
This study examines how effective Componential Analysis (CA), a classic semantic theory, can be used to analyze the many meanings of the English word “fuck”. Componential analysis breaks words into smaller parts called semantic components. The word “fuck” is a good test for this theory because it has a simple concrete meaning but is used in many different concrete and abstract ways. Using examples from the BFSU CQPweb corpus, the study first lists the main ways “fuck” is used. Then, it tries to break down each use into a set of components. The results show that CA works well for the simple, concrete meanings of “fuck,” such as its use for sex or damage. However, the components become too general and vague for uses where “fuck” is mainly used to express strong feelings. The study also notes some problems with the corpus and methods used, which affected the results. Beyond its theoretical evaluation, this analysis offers practical insights and suggests directions for further study. The findings imply that for language pedagogy, teaching a word like fuck effectively requires explicitly addressing its wide meanings and emotions, helping learners navigate its social impact. Methodologically, the challenges encountered, such as complex corpus queries and inconsistent data tagging, highlight the need for better technical training in corpus linguistics for students and researchers. Future research could build on this work by using larger spoken corpora or social media data to more fully capture informal and expressive uses, or by applying a similar analytical approach to other taboo words to test the generalizability of these findings.
Keywords:
Componential Analysis; Semantics; Taboo Words; Polysemy; Corpus LinguisticsData Availability Statement
The data supporting this study were obtained from the BFSU CQPweb corpus (AmE Brown Family Corpora), which is a publicly available corpus analysis platform. The specific queries used in this study are described in the Methodology section. The corpus data itself cannot be shared directly due to platform terms of use, but interested researchers can access the same corpus via BFSU CQPweb and replicate the queries provided in this paper. Examples of infix usage were sourced from publicly accessible dictionaries and online forums as cited in the paper.
Copyright Notice & License:
This article is published in Silence under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original author(s) and source are properly credited.
The author(s) retain copyright of the work. By publishing in the journal, the author(s) grant Silence a non-exclusive, worldwide, and irrevocable license to publish, archive, and disseminate this article in all forms and media.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
J. I. Saeed, Semantics, 4th ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2015.
L. Hatem, “The rise of the f-word: From taboo to mainstream in pop culture,” Beijing Times, 2024, newspaper article.
J. Lyons, Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
T. Yuan, “The application of componential analysis in teaching chinese near-synonyms to international learners,” Chinese Character Culture, no. 2, pp. 92–94, 2025.
N. Riemer, Introducing semantics. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
J. Sheidlower. (2024) A brief history of the most famous swear word in the world: Jesse sheidlower on the limberness and literary uses of ”fuck”. Lit Hub. [Online]. Available: https://lithub.com/a-brief-history-of-the-most-famous-swear-word-in-the-world/
M. H. Levinson, “What the fuck: Examining an ”obscene” term,” ETC.: A Review of General Semantics, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 105+, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A763441542/LitRC?u=cnbnu&sid=summon&xid=5689aff5
A. Montell, Wordslut: A feminist guide to taking back the English language. Beijing United Publishing Co., Ltd., 2024.
C. Luu. (2015) Fanf—kingtastic and edumacational: The case of english infixation. Lingua Obscura (JSTOR). [Online]. Available: https://daily.jstor.org/fanfuckingtastic-and-edumacational-the-case-of-english-infixation/
A. Hardie, “Cqpweb - combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool,” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 380–409, 2012.
