Vol. 1 (2025): 乡村治理现代化与绿色转型路径探索 : Pathways to Rural Governance Modernization and Green Transformation

					View Vol. 1 (2025): 乡村治理现代化与绿色转型路径探索 : Pathways to Rural Governance Modernization and Green Transformation

本卷为《农村治理与绿色发展》创刊号(Volume 1),汇聚了来自不同学科的研究成果,围绕“乡村治理现代化(Rural Governance Modernization)”与“绿色转型(Green Transformation)”两大主题,探讨政策制度创新、生态治理机制、数字乡村建设、绿色技术路径及基层治理韧性等关键议题。

文章涵盖 研究论著(Original Research Articles)政策观察与案例研究(Policy Insights & Case Studies)绿色技术与数字乡村(Green Technologies & Digital Villages)、青年学者论坛(Young Scholar Forum)与书评(Book Reviews)等多个栏目,力求搭建一个跨学科、跨区域、聚焦联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)的高水平学术交流平台。

This inaugural volume of Rural Governance and Green Development presents a curated selection of interdisciplinary contributions that explore pathways toward rural governance modernization and green transformation in China and beyond. The issue emphasizes empirical inquiry and theoretical innovation across a range of topics, including institutional reform, ecological governance, rural digitalization, green technologies, and resilience at the grassroots level.

By integrating multiple thematic columns, this volume aims to contribute to global dialogues on sustainable rural futures aligned with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Published: 2025-12-30

书评(Book Reviews)

  • 从“县官不如现管”到机制创新:《县乡中国》的权力逻辑与基层治理韧性 From “County Magistrates Are No Match for Local Operators” to Institutional Innovation: Power Logic and Governance Resilience in County and Township China

    宋安邦(Song Anbang) (Author)
    1-3
    Abstract: 本书评围绕杨华的《县乡中国:县域治理现代化》,概述了其在条块关系、政策执行、基层自主空间和干部激励机制方面的核心贡献。书中基于长期田野调查,揭示了“县官不如现管”这一治理命题的制度逻辑,展现出县域治理现代化在国家统一性与基层灵活性之间的张力。评述指出,县级政府通过“政治任务”实现资源统筹,导致形式主义风险,但同时基层也通过机制创新展现出韧性。该书为理解当代中国县域治理的复杂性提供了宝贵的实证视角,对乡村振兴和国家治理现代化研究具有重要启示意义。 This review centers on Yang Hua’s County and Township China: Modernization of County-Level Governance, summarizing its key contributions in the areas of central-local relations, policy execution, grassroots autonomy, and cadre incentive mechanisms. Grounded in long-term fieldwork, the book reveals the institutional logic behind the governance dilemma encapsulated in... [Read More]
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17328345
  • ”空心西班牙“的镜像:一场对现代化背后代价的深刻凝视 The Hollowing of Spain: A Profound Reflection on the Costs of Modernization

    王彤(Wang Tong) (Author)
    4-6
    Abstract: 《断裂的乡村:走过不曾如此空心的西班牙》是一部深具批判性的文化观察著作。西班牙作家塞尔吉奥·德尔·莫利诺以文学性的笔触,从“外来者”视角探讨乡村人口流失、文化断裂与城乡关系张力,揭示了“西班牙无人村”背后的社会历史动因。本文书评从该书的结构与主题出发,分析其对城市中心主义的批判、对乡村政治边缘化的追问以及对“文化记忆”重构的关照,并与中国乡村振兴背景进行比较,指出本书对理解当代乡村变迁具有重要的跨文化参考价值。  "The Hollowing of Spain: A Journey Through the Fractured Countryside" is a culturally incisive work by Spanish author Sergio del Molino. Through a literary and outsider's lens, the book explores rural depopulation, cultural rupture, and tensions between urban and rural Spain. This review analyzes the book’s structure and themes, including its critique of urban centrism, the... [Read More]
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17403758
  • Cultural Diversity and Social Integration in Rural Dance Education: A Review of Kristie Mortimer’s Dance and Cultural Difference in Aotearoa

    Bing Yan (Author)
    7-9
    Abstract: This review evaluates Kristie Mortimer’s Dance and Cultural Difference in Aotearoa, focusing on its contributions to understanding the role of rural dance education in promoting cultural diversity and social integration. Drawing on intercultural pedagogy and embodied knowledge, Mortimer’s work positions rural dance studios as micro-publics that mediate identity, participation, and inclusion. Through a comparative lens, the review highlights the book’s relevance for rural governance and cultural policy in China, especially amid ongoing revitalization initiatives. It concludes by... [Read More]
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17404076

政策观察与案例研究(Policy Insights & Case Studies)

  • 新时代下党建引领乡贤回引助推乡村振兴的路径探析 Exploring the Pathways of Party Building-Led Return of Local Elites to Promote Rural Revitalization in the New Era

    宋云(Song Yun) (Author)
    10-25
    Abstract: 乡村振兴是关乎国计民生的重大战略举措,人才振兴在其中发挥着关键支撑作用。本文聚焦党建引领乡贤回引这一核心主题,深入剖析其对乡村振兴的多元推动路径及深远实践意义。综合运用文献研究法、案例分析法、访谈调查法与实证研究法,从组织建设强化、产业发展驱动、文化传承创新、生态环境优化及基层治理提升五大维度,系统揭示党建引领乡贤回引整合乡村资源、激发内生发展动力、重塑乡村发展格局的内在逻辑,为乡村振兴提供可持续的智力支持与实践指引,助力农业农村现代化建设迈向高质量发展新阶段。 Rural revitalization is a major strategic initiative vital to national development and public well-being, with talent revitalization playing a critical supporting role. This paper focuses on the core theme of Party building-led return of local elites ("xiangxian") and provides an in-depth analysis of its multifaceted pathways and profound practical... [Read More]
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.63802/rggd.V1.2025.164

绿色技术与数字乡村(Green Technologies & Digital Villages)

  • 扎根乡土:返乡入乡人员绿色创业协同逻辑 Root in Rural Areas: The Synergistic Logic of Green Entrepreneurship Among Returning Rural Personnel

    骆诗朋(Luo Shipeng), 李恩(Li En) (Author)
    26-36
    Abstract: 返乡入乡人员作为乡村振兴战略实施的关键微观主体,其绿色创业是践行“绿水青山就是金山银山”理念的重要生态行动。然而,在返乡入乡绿色创业群体规模持续扩大的背景下,创业存活率偏低、可持续增长动能不足、持续创业意愿弱化等问题日益凸显。在此背景下,云凤模式通过差异化实践探索出了一条可持续的绿色创业路径。本研究基于协同视角,系统解构云凤模式“四化融合”的核心本质,以生态化夯实绿色创业根基、以组织化实现个体向群体的聚合、以合作化推动分散向协同的整合、以数字化完成传统向数字的转型。通过案例分析法,揭示云凤模式成功的关键机制,提炼返乡入乡人员绿色创业的协同逻辑,为其他返乡入乡创业人员提供实践借鉴。 Returning rural entrepreneurs, as key micro-level actors in the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy, engage in green entrepreneurship as a critical ecological practice to realize the vision that "lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets." However, amid the continuous... [Read More]
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.63802/rggd.V1.2025.172

编者推荐 / 特约专题(Editor’s Choice / Thematic Issues)

  • 乡村治理的分寸感:再评“防止规模性返乡滞乡” The Sense of Proportion in Rural Governance: Rethinking the Policy of "Preventing Large-Scale Return and Settlement in the Countryside"

    杨一鸣(Yang Yiming) (Author)
    Ⅰ-Ⅲ
    Abstract: 2025年11月,农业农村部提出“防止形成规模性返乡滞乡”的政策表述,引发社会广泛讨论。本文指出,该政策并非限制农民工返乡的权利,而是着眼于防范因返乡后就业困难所导致的返贫风险。在当前城市就业空间受限、乡村产业承载力不足的背景下,公众对自身生存路径的焦虑日益加剧。文章主张,治理实践应在保障人口流动自由的前提下,提升县域经济“吸纳力”,通过产业扶持、技能培训与返乡创业支持等措施,赋予返乡以发展的可能,使其成为一种体面而可持续的选择,从而体现治理的温度与分寸。 In November 2025, the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs emphasized the need to “prevent large-scale return and settlement in the countryside,” sparking widespread public debate. This article argues that the policy aims not to restrict rural migrant workers from returning home, but rather to prevent poverty resurgence due to unemployment after... [Read More]
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.63802/rggd.V1.2025.180