Convenience vs. Choice: Why Users Prefer a Cluttered but Functionally Universal App Interface to Other Specialized Apps Using Kaspi as an Example
Kookmin University graduate student
Abstract
In an increasingly fragmented mobile app ecosystem, users are faced with the challenge of choosing between streamlined, specialized applications and multifunctional but visually overloaded superapps. This paper investigates why users often prefer the latter, using Kaspi.kz in Kazakhstan as a case study. Drawing upon Cognitive Load Theory and the Paradox of Choice, the study explores how superapps minimize extraneous cognitive load and decision fatigue by offering a unified interface for diverse tasks. Despite potential usability concerns, factors such as transactional efficiency, data-driven personalization, and perceived trust play a key role in user preference. A mixed-methods experimental design is proposed to evaluate usability, efficiency, satisfaction, and trust across both app categories. Preliminary findings from the Kaspi.kz case suggest that its design, though complex, successfully mitigates interface clutter through intuitive navigation and responsiveness. Ultimately, this study argues that the appeal of superapps lies in their ability to simplify digital life, turning potential disadvantages into key advantages.
Keywords:
Superapp, Specialized apps, Paradox of choice, Cognitive Load TheoryCopyright Notice & License:
All articles published in Journal of Law, Psychology, and Communication Studies are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits:
-
Unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium;
-
Commercial and non-commercial use;
-
Adaptation and transformation, including derivative works;
provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, and a link to the license is included.
Authors retain full copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of first publication.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PDF Downloads
Journal Info
How to Cite
References
Liang, S., & Wei, J. (2024). Understanding users’ app-switching behavior during the mobile search: An empirical study from the perspective of push-pull-mooring framework.
Liu, X. (2024). Enhancing user engagement through adaptive UI/UX design: A study on personalized mobile app interfaces.
Hasselwander, S., & Weiss, A. (2025). Consumer preferences for super app services: E-commerce, social media, and banking dominate.
Majumder, S. (2024). The influence of UX design on user retention and conversion rates in mobile apps.
Talgatuly, B. (2025). Digital marketing strategies in Kazakhstani super-apps: A case study of Kaspi and Freedom Finance.
Jiang, L. (2022). The impact of perceived interactivity and intrinsic value on users' continuance intention in using mobile augmented reality virtual shoe-try-on function.
Kim, M. A. (2015). The role of prior attitude and persuasion knowledge in mobile application contents for public interest.
